In accordance with the NSW Rail Access Undertaking, the Tribunal is reviewing the compliance of the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) and Rail Corporation New South Wales (RailCorp) – the infrastructure owners - with the provisions of the NSW Rail Access Undertaking (Undertaking) which relate to asset valuation roll forward principles and the operation of the ceiling test and unders and overs account for 2005/06
This brief paper, prepared by the Tribunal, is to facilitate stakeholder consultation on whether actual, rather than levellised, major periodic maintenance (MPM) is preferable when reviewing compli
| Date received | Entity | Name | Download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Jun 2007 | ARTC | D Marchant | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | ARTC | D Marchant | |
| 30 Jul 2007 | Minerals Council | Dr N Williams | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | Pacific National | D Irwin | |
| 6 Jun 2007 | Pacific National | D Irwin | |
| 31 May 2007 | QR National | S Cantwell | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | Railcorp | D Frame | |
| 4 Aug 2007 | RailCorp | D Frame | |
| 5 Jun 2006 | RailCorp | T Gausden | |
| 5 Jun 2007 | WHite Mining/ Felix Resources | T Page |
* Part of submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons
** Submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons
The Tribunal has determined that both Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) and Rail Corporation New South Wales (RailCorp) have complied with the ceiling test for the 2005/06 financial year.
This statement sets out the Tribunal’s policy on the appropriate measure for major periodic maintenance (MPM) cost in assessing compliance with the ceiling test, following consultation undertaken a
This document replaces pages 1-18 of ARTC’s submission to the Tribunal dated 23 March 2007, which was prepared pursuant to Schedule 3, clause 5(a) of the NSW Rail Access Undertaking.
The Tribunal has determined that both Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) and Rail Corporation New South Wales (RailCorp) have complied with the Asset Valuation Roll Forward principles for the
This submission was prepared by RailCorp pursuant to Schedule 3, clause 5(a) of the NSW Rail Access Undertaking.
This submission was prepared by ARTC pursuant to Schedule 3, clause 5(a) of the NSW Rail Access Undertaking.
This report was prepared for the Tribunal by CRA International as an input to IPART's review of the compliance of Australian Rail Track Corporation(ARTC) with the NSW Rail Access Undertaking ceilin
This brief paper, prepared by the Tribunal, is to facilitate stakeholder consultation on whether actual, rather than levellised, major periodic maintenance (MPM) is preferable when reviewing compli
| Date received | Entity | Name | Download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Jun 2007 | ARTC | D Marchant | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | ARTC | D Marchant | |
| 30 Jul 2007 | Minerals Council | Dr N Williams | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | Pacific National | D Irwin | |
| 6 Jun 2007 | Pacific National | D Irwin | |
| 31 May 2007 | QR National | S Cantwell | |
| 25 Jul 2007 | Railcorp | D Frame | |
| 4 Aug 2007 | RailCorp | D Frame | |
| 5 Jun 2006 | RailCorp | T Gausden | |
| 5 Jun 2007 | WHite Mining/ Felix Resources | T Page |
* Part of submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons
** Submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons
This report was prepared by the Tribunal in 1999 in response to a request by the then NSW Premier to review specific aspects of the NSW Rail Access Regime, when Rail Access Corporation (RAC) was ow
These Guidelines, prepared by the Tribunal, are designed to provide information and guidance to rail infrastructure owners, access seekers and interested parties in relation to the Tribunal’s annua