Explains key findings and recommendations for increasing the use of demand management (DM) options to meet customer energy needs in NSW. Identifies 3 broad groups of DM responses—environmentally driven, network driven and retail market driven—and the barriers to and options for encouraging greater use of each type. Also discusses why DM is needed, and its costs, benefits, potential capacity and reliability.
Submissions received for Interim Report - Inquiry into the Role of Demand Management and Other Options in the Provision of Energy Services - April 2002
| Date received | Entity | Name | Download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Jun 2002 | TransGrid | ||
| 13 Jun 2002 | AGL | ||
| 13 Jun 2002 | Australian Consumers Association | Charles Britton | |
| 12 Jun 2002 | Organisation | Adrian Ray | |
| 12 Jun 2002 | Country Energy | Terry Miller | |
| 16 Jun 2002 | Organisation | George Maltabarow | |
| 13 Jun 2002 | Institute for Sustainable Futures | Keith Tarlo | |
| 16 Jun 2002 | Integral Energy | Richard Powis | |
| 16 Jun 2002 | Ministry of Energy and Utilities | Brian Steffan | |
| 23 Jun 2002 | Nature Conservation Council of NSW | Felicity Calvert | |
| 19 Jun 2002 | Pacific Solar | Peter Lawley | |
| 18 Jun 2002 | Organisation | Trish Benson | |
| 29 Jul 2002 | SEDA | Mark Fogarty | |
| 13 Jun 2002 | University of New South Wales | Hugh Outhred |
* Part of submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons
** Submission not published due to confidentiality and/or other legal reasons